I was unsure, beforehand, about whether I had an interest in this young man's talents. My wife and eldest daughter were mesmerised by him, his talent and the show. From the snippets I'd heard, his tone sounded a little rough for my delicate ears but this was a family outing so I went.
The venue was less than half full and, I found out later, Boy George was there as well. I was really hoping that more people would turn out, no matter what I say, I do believe that Classical music should be well supported. The general public would be surprised if they attended a classical concert. Pick the program very carefully and make sure that either there is a piece you know or a concert of shorter pieces and you won't be disappointed.
Anyway, I hadn't checked the program so I had no clue what to expect and I certainly didn't expect a stage full of dry ice and our man rising from a coffin to start the show!
Here is the dilemma, this was a show, the lighting was incredible and very artistic. Amadeus had all the poses, camped it up and struck some shapes that, with the lighting, will remain with me for a very long time, I wished I'd had my camera with me, it was artistry at work. Was this to the detriment of his playing? Absolutely not. Will this overshadow his playing? Possibly. In the classical world they are not used to a show, a violinist will stand and play in a well lit auditorium, I have little doubt that he will be dismissed by many, but the proof is in the pudding.
Here, in a nutshell is my opinion of this strange young man. We haven't seen his like in a generation or more. We are used to the skills and talents of Menuhin, Heifetz, Perlman, Kreisler and Tasmin Little but he is different. He plays with his tone, creating the roughness between the tender sweetness, the use of contrasts. He took the most difficult pieces in violin repertoire, and played them all in this program. The Paganini Caprices, Pärt "Fratres", Czardas, Danse Macabre, the whole of the Carmen Fantasy, it was the most incredible treat, audibly and visually. This is a man cut from the same cloth as Paganini and Sarasate. A deadpan face betrayed in fleeting moments when the music reached the levels of a true virtuosity, a brief smile of enjoyment that told more about this than any words ever could.
I have a friend that will accuse me of gushing and that is probably correct but this was Classical brought into the 21st Century and I hope that this can coexist with traditional Classical. Amadeus Leopold is a look into the future at what can be. I recommend that everyone should go and see him, he is disturbing, theatrical, emotive and genuine. I was prepared to be disappointed and instead was amazed. Anyone that will take the most difficult of pieces and put them all into a single program is either a prodigy or a madman. Or maybe a little of both.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psq5cQenrG0
When he plays next you must be there, he is an exciting prospect and needs to be supported, an anomaly in this day and age, an analogue man in a digital format, a fusion of what is, what was and what will be. My heart is always torn between what I know and what I don't, in this instance I believe in the unknown.
Pay attention to this one, he could be the chosen one.
All hail the new Paganini.
PS. The Carmen is one of my favourites and I've never seen it live before
and this performance was easily the best I've ever heard it played. If you do nothing else from this post, look it up, I haven't included a link because it won't be played by Amadeus.